Difference Acrylic And Polyester

The Supreme Court ruled not to the extradition requested by the Colombian government of a Chilean Manuel Olate, because the evidence presented by the prosecution were not sufficient.
is shown that this was a setup, first term against the Mapuche movement fighting for autonomy and its territory usurped by the Chilean state and step involves the Communist Party. One of his deputies, and directly to the party militant, Manuel Olate, trying to catch two birds with one stone. Olate is a leader who meets internationalist tasks that has always characterized this game.
The accusations do not stand up under scrutiny, is to ignore the Mapuche history, they have always fought to defend their territory and culture. Among them were distinguished military strategists as Lautaro, Pelantaru, Caupolicán.
The struggle today is different, it is a struggle for constitutional recognition and autonomy, with demonstrations, with tables of dialogue. Problems have arisen because governments have not fulfilled the agreements promised. Rep. Edwards
however foolishly insists that there are connections between FARC and the Mapuche. To do this bring out the reports submitted by the government of Colombia over alleged travel and interviews of Chilean citizens. These reports were given to leaders of the Chilean right, including Pinera, when he was not yet president. Chilean prosecutors and studied for over a year, these background and rejected for not having valid.
now say they respect the ruling but insist on its truth. They say it is necessary to investigate the funding of organizations that fight for peace in Colombia
Dan as an argument that there is no investment in the region for over 6 years by the violence of the conflict that "cause" of the Mapuche.
You want to discredit the Mapuche, saying it promoted violence. But we must see who promotes violence, the Mapuche not clear. It is clear that there are provocations and more than one Mapuche mistakenly act without taking into account the overall fight. These are certainly possibilities that the Attorney does not investigate. It
concerned with the persecution, criminalization of the struggle is to frighten the Mapuche people and prevent their struggle for autonomy, culture and land. Rep. Edwards should provide explanations for their mistake, to maintain a lie, a lie against these people and apologize.